The Telltale Signs That Indicate If Your Favorite News Media Outlet Is Guilty of Promoting Racism

Wafubeh! Welcome to Warlock Asylum International News, your choice for the latest in current events, entertainment, religion, and politics, as seen from a shamanic perspective. If this is your first time visiting the news page, it is suggested that you use this opportunity to get familiar with the website and explore some of our previous articles.  We value your opinion and insights, so do not hesitate to leave a comment. Wishing you all the best in your earthly endeavors, have an awesome day!

While the subject of both race and racism are seen as a religion created by negative entities in the shamanic world, it is quite entertaining to see how many modern-day institutions try to reinforce this religion upon human society.

Surprisingly, many people hold faith that the news media is actually one of the biggest promoters of this demented mentality of race and racism.  For those of us who seek honest and sincere news, I have made a list of some telltale signs that indicate if a news media outlet is guilty of promoting bigotry. Enjoy!

1- Bigoted news media outlets often question African-American and Latino entertainers about their opinions on black activists groups, such as Black Lives Matters, The Nation of Islam, minority activist groups, and religious leaders that are seen as agitators.

There is nothing wrong with asking an entertainer to express their opinion about current events, or what their opinions are in regards to a leader of an organization that wields a level of influence over society. This is quite understandable. However, when such questioning is limited to groups representing African-Americans and the Latino populations, then more than likely this news media outlet is promoting bigotry.

When the Nation of Islam was organizing a Million Man March, during the mid-90’s, so many reporters were asking black celebrities about their opinion on the march and the Nation of Islam as an organization. Still, we have yet to see a news reporter questioning a white celebrity about their opinion, or relationship with the Ku Klux Klan, or their positions on the militia groups, whose populations have dramatically increased over the past ten years.

Ironically, most of the “black agitators” that are depicted in the news media do not carry any weaponry. The same cannot be said, however, for many of the militia groups in America. Where is their funding coming from? So wouldn’t it make sense if the likes of a Geraldo Rivera would get up off their asses and start asking white celebrities their opinions about the statements, actions, and philosophies of both militia and white extremist groups?

2-A Bigoted News Media Source Will Often Play Hide and Seek Games When It Comes To Revealing the Face of a Suspect in the News.

There was a time, not too long ago, when New York City newspapers would play a game of “hide and seek.” When a crime was reported and the suspect was white, these newspapers would wait 72 hours before revealing the suspect’s face in the news and would never make it a front page story. In such cases, the newspaper would put the face of the victim on the front page instead of the suspect, especially if the victim was a member of America’s golden class of minorities. This is done in order to keep the crime associated with the face of a minority.  However, if the suspect is Black or Latino, their face will be shown within six hours after the crime was reported.

These types of news tactics, wherein a newspaper would turn a horrendous crime into a game of hide and seek in an effort of keeping the “race” of the suspect concealed, reveal the demented mentality behind the forces running much of the news media today. Yet, the people support such bigotry due to their own insecurities.

3 – A Bigoted News Media Makes Statements like – “America is a Christian Nation.”

There are many people in this country who never explore the principles that America was founded upon. So it is no surprise that when politicians and news media sources say that America is a “Christian Nation,” that most citizens of this country are blind to the agenda behind such language. In the same manner that Judaism is an ethnoreligious community, so was Christianity recognize as an ethnic religion, reserved for those of European descent. Under the topic, Christian Identity, Wikipedia states:

“Christian Identity (also known as Identity Christianity) is a white separatist interpretation of Christianity which advocates the belief that Germanic peoples (including Anglo-Saxon, Nordic peoples) and people of kindred blood are the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and hence the descendants of the ancient Israelites (primarily as a result of the Assyrian captivity)…….

Christian Identity dictates that all non-whites (people not of wholly European descent) on the planet will either be exterminated or enslaved (Dominion Theology) in order to serve the White race in the new Heavenly Kingdom on Earth under the reign of Jesus Christ.”

So how did the Founding Fathers and early Americans view Christianity? The Treaty of Peace and Friendship, Signed at Tripoli November 4, 1796, Article 11, states:

“As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion,-as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen,-and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.”

4- Bigoted New Media Source Are Quick To Say That The Democratic Party is Designed to Help Minorities.”

Democrats voted against Civil Rights, from the KKK, and fought to maintain slavery in America. It’s amazing to see many news media sources promoting the idea that the Democratic Party is designed to help minorities. If you would like more information on the subject, check out this Timeline of Democratic Bigotry.

Summary: People are free to choose whatever news media outlet they feel most drawn to watch. However, the world would be a better place if we were to hold its reporters and representatives to standards of moral excellence. In order for this to occur, those watching the news have to be free enough to think on their own, do their own research, and understand world history. Perhaps, it’s easier for people not to think, and this too is part of the news.