ancient culture

The Identity of the Sumerians As Seen In Ancient Art

Greetings!

I would like to welcome everyone to the Simon Necronomicon’s Info Page. If thisi s your first time here, please review some of our previous articles first. Welcome!

I thought that I would take a little time to discuss the great Sumerian fraud that is going on in the feild of anthropology and the occult community. It seems that there is a growing population that is trying to hide the identity of the ancient Sumerians. We have to remember that the Sumerians called themselves the Sag-giga meaning the “black-headed ones.” However, it has become popular for some occultist and anthropologists to use artifacts from the “Mesopotamian period” in describing the Sumerian Civilization. You would think that racism would NOT find its way into such studies as the occult, but on some levels it has. I spoke about this briefly in our discussion about the ARRA Sign:

https://warlockasylum.wordpress.com/arra-sign/

The term Aryan is derived from the Sanskrit term arya meaning “noble” or “spiritual.” This term had nothing to due with physical characteristics as it is often misunderstood to represent. The following references are useful in further illustrating this point;

(History of Ethiopia, Vol. I., Preface, by Sir E. A. Wallis Budge.) In addition Budge notes that, “Homer and Herodotus call all the peoples of the Sudan, Egypt, Arabia, Palestine and Western Asia and India Ethiopians.” (Ibid., p. 2.) Herodotus wrote in his celebrated History that both the Western Ethiopians, who lived in Africa, and the Eastern Ethiopians who dwelled in India, were black in complexion, but that the Africans had curly hair, while the Indians were straight-haired.”

Before the Chaldean rule in Mesopotamia, there were the empires of the Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians and Assyrians. The earliest civilization of Mesopotamia was that of the Sumerians. They are designated in the Assyrio-Babylonian inscriptions as the black-heads or black-faced people, and they are shown on the monuments as beardless and with shaven heads. This easily distinguishes them from the Semitic Babylonians, who are shown with beards and long hair. From the myths and traditions of the Babylonians we learn that their culture came originally from the south. Sir Henry Rawlinson concluded from this and other evidence that the first civilized inhabitants of Sumer and Akkad were immigrants from the African Ethiopia. John D. Baldwin, the American Orientalist, on the other hand, claims that since ancient Arabia was also known as Ethiopia, they could have just as well come from that country. These theories are rejected by Dr. II. R. Hall, of the Dept. Of Egyptian & Assyrian Antiquities of the British Museum, who contends that Mesopotamia was civilized by a migration from India? “The ethnic type of the Sumerians, so strongly marked in their statues and reliefs,” says Dr. Hall, “was as different from those of the races which surrounded them as was their language from those of the Semites, Aryans, or others; they were decidedly Indian in type. The face-type of the average Indian of today is no doubt much the same as that of his Dravidian race ancestors thousands of years ago. … And it is to this Dravidian ethnic type of India that the ancient Sumerian bears most resemblance, so far as we can judge from his monuments. … And it is by no means improbable that the Sumerians were an Indian race which passed, certainly by land, perhaps also by sea, through Persia to the valley of the Two Rivers. It was in the Indian home (perhaps the Indus valley) that we suppose for them that their culture developed. … On the way they left the seeds of their culture in Elam. … There is little doubt that India must have been one of the earliest centers of human civilization, and it seems natural to suppose that the strange un-Semitic, un-Aryan people who came from the East to civilize the West were of Indian origin, especially when we see with our own eyes how very Indian the Sumerians were in type.” (The Ancient History of the Near East, pp. 173–174, London, 1916.)”

Another interesting point to consider is how modern-day scholars try to hide the identity of these people by using images and sculptures from other periods to describe the whole history of Ancient Sumeria. An example of this can be seen by looking at the history of the United States. It has been recorded and well documented that when the Europeans came to America, there were already an existing people here. If we were to describe these people as Americans it would not be an accurate description, since these people did not call themselves American. Now imagine living 3,000 years into the future and you are doing research about the history of America, and the ancient Americans are described as having European features. British relics are discovered along the coast of South Carolina, but the question remains; who were the original people of the Americas? Many scholars would point to them as being British and what we call Native American history today, would be represented by the face of U.S. Presidents. This is the same trick that modern-day scholars use to hide the characteristics of the people who inhabited many ancient lands, Ancient Sumeria included.

Since the people of Ancient Sumeria were similar in physical type, class distinctions were made. Later, invading peoples adopted only the most benevolent terms to describe themselves by, and recreated the gods of these people in their own image.

“The ancient gods of India are shown with Ethiopian crowns on their heads. According to the Old Testament, Moses first met Jehovah during his sojourn among the Midianites, who were an Ethiopian tribe. We learn from Hellenic tradition that Zeus, king of the Grecian gods, so cherished the friendship of the Ethiopians that he traveled to their country twice a year to attend banquets. “All the gods and goddesses of Greece were black,” asserts Sir Godfrey Higgins, “at least this was the case with Jupiter, Baccus, Hercules, Apollo, Ammon. The goddesses Benum, Isis, Hecate, Diana, Juno, Metis, Ceres, Cybele were black.” (Anacalypsis, Vol. I, Book IV, Chap. I.)”

Since there are many people iin the field of anthropology and occult studies who would like to hide the imagery of some of the most ancient depictions of the Sumerian and Elamite civilizations, we will provide these as seen below:

The above image of “Lilith” is actually the original. However, the re-construction of this image has become more popular that the original. This may be due to the fact that the original (as seen above) presents a more “ethnic” view of Lilith

I would like to wish everyone a safe and happy holiday season

Warlock Asylum

Advertisements

16 replies »

  1. This is an excellent read. I don’t know how or why I ended up here but I will be sure to subscribe.

    Sumerian history and mythology has presented itself to me in the past but for some odd reason it’s particularly fascinating right now. I look forward to reading more of your work!

    Like

  2. This is a very late response however it would appear that you have done exactly the same thing as those you claim to be racist, you provided 4 or 5 photos and a few questionable translations and some how come to the conclusion that Sumerians were black or Indian. First there is an adundance of evidence to the contrary not to mention how ethnics try to cover certain histories to deny Aryan identies in much the same manner as you decried. I find it disgusting and hypocritical such false conclusions and racism from those like you claiming of Aryan cover ups to with hold ones heritage then do exactly the very same racist act. The truth will be known and lies will be quelled. So stop acting in hypocrisy and look again. Liars!

    Like

  3. Oh and in case you were unaware, slavery in America was actual started by a black man. Funny how that was hidden from most history books aswell, I believe this is one of your ” racist” denials you speak about in this ficticious rambling. People do not take anyones word at face value do your own research and find the truth because regardless of what some people may tell you whites are not the only people that can be racist and misrepresent history, not by a long shot!! Racist hypocrites!!!

    Like

  4. There are several articles that are written on the blog page that have supplied additional evidence to support our findings in this article. Firstly, famous Sumerianologist Samuel Noah Kramer, made the following statement in the book entitled Sumerian Mythology:

    The Sumerians were a non-Semitic, non-Indo-European people who lived in southern Babylonia from 4000-3000 B.C.E. They invented cuneiform writing, and their spiritual beliefs influenced all successive Near Eastern religions, including Judaism, Christianity and Islam. They produced an extensive body of literature, among the oldest in the world. Samuel Noah Kramer spent most of his life studying this literature, by piecing together clay tablets in far-flung museums.”

    You can also view some of our previous articles which discuss the subject in great detail:

    https://warlockasylum.wordpress.com/signs-seals-symbols-and-sigils/arra-sign/

    “(History of Ethiopia, Vol. I., Preface, by Sir E. A. Wallis Budge.) In addition Budge notes that, “Homer and Herodotus call all the peoples of the Sudan, Egypt, Arabia, Palestine and Western Asia and India Ethiopians.” (Ibid., p. 2.) Herodotus wrote in his celebrated History that both the Western Ethiopians, who lived in Africa, and the Eastern Ethiopians who dwelled in India, were black in complexion, but that the Africans had curly hair, while the Indians were straight-haired.”

    “Before the Chaldean rule in Mesopotamia, there were the empires of the Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians and Assyrians. The earliest civilization of Mesopotamia was that of the Sumerians. They are designated in the Assyrio-Babylonian inscriptions as the black-heads or black-faced people, and they are shown on the monuments as beardless and with shaven heads. This easily distinguishes them from the Semitic Babylonians, who are shown with beards and long hair. From the myths and traditions of the Babylonians we learn that their culture came originally from the south. Sir Henry Rawlinson concluded from this and other evidence that the first civilized inhabitants of Sumer and Akkad were immigrants from the African Ethiopia. John D. Baldwin, the American Orientalist, on the other hand, claims that since ancient Arabia was also known as Ethiopia, they could have just as well come from that country. These theories are rejected by Dr. II. R. Hall, of the Dept. Of Egyptian & Assyrian Antiquities of the British Museum, who contends that Mesopotamia was civilized by a migration from India? “The ethnic type of the Sumerians, so strongly marked in their statues and reliefs,” says Dr. Hall, “was as different from those of the races which surrounded them as was their language from those of the Semites, Aryans, or others; they were decidedly Indian in type. The face-type of the average Indian of today is no doubt much the same as that of his Dravidian race ancestors thousands of years ago. … And it is to this Dravidian ethnic type of India that the ancient Sumerian bears most resemblance, so far as we can judge from his monuments. … And it is by no means improbable that the Sumerians were an Indian race which passed, certainly by land, perhaps also by sea, through Persia to the valley of the Two Rivers. It was in the Indian home (perhaps the Indus valley) that we suppose for them that their culture developed. … On the way they left the seeds of their culture in Elam. … There is little doubt that India must have been one of the earliest centers of human civilization, and it seems natural to suppose that the strange un-Semitic, un-Aryan people who came from the East to civilize the West were of Indian origin, especially when we see with our own eyes how very Indian the Sumerians were in type.” (The Ancient History of the Near East, pp. 173–174, London, 1916.)”

    stay blessed

    Like

  5. sumerians are not the ethiopians sumerians were canaanites they are the dravidians and another branch of the dravidians settled in syria they are the phoenicians! in prophets and patriarchs it says that nimrod was son of cush son of canaan 2 different cushs the dna of dravidians is L google L and see what u get

    Like

  6. believe it or not When i do salawaat on the Prophet PBH i see things when i sleep

    dravidians:On a spiritual side I have seen Prophet Muhammad PBH 10times and I say it with no boasting I dreamt of the Prophet PBH and I am standing besides him and I was told I am not a sayyid and I ask the Prophet PBH about the Indian people, he PBH had a big smile on his face this is why I started to find out about the Indian people particularly the dark ones 2times I dreamt the dravidians are the sumerians and 1time they are from Canaan and that the blacks and ethiopians are from cush ibn ham

    and after a yr I came across something in Prophets and Patriarchs which it said 2times Nimrod(disbeliever was son of cush son of canaan son of ham There is two cush’s and people have gotten them mixed up

    i dreamt a explanation of the dravidians i was told in the dream (hamitic) in type with straight hair and were also egyptians then after some time i dreamt the dravidians came from the fertile crescent in syria close to the sea and after this i dreamt they came from egypt close to the sea and i see arrows showing their travel one arrow goes up into the fertile crescent in syria and the other goes east through south iraq and southern iran until the arrow reached northwest india! also i dreamt of a migration in the shape of a U on the river nile nowhere did i see anything to do with the horn of africa On 13/11/11 I dreamt the dravidians are Phoenicians( A branch of Dravidians did settle in the fertile crescent in syria close to the sea) on the 28/12/11 i dreamt the phoenecians in north africa and i saw italy and there is interaction between them both also i dreamt a sprinkler and the water coming out of it was from sumerians ( it watered the europeans)

    and 02/02/12 i dreamt of egyptians and i see dark people i was told egyptians had straight hair

    Like

  7. Keep dreaming! The Greek historian Herodotus wrote, concerning the Egyptians:

    “I asked them both; and the Colchians had remembrance of the Egyptians more than the Egyptians of the Colchians; but the Egyptians said they believed that the Colchians were a portion of the army of Sesostris. That this was so I conjectured myself not only because they are dark-skinned and have curly hair (this of itself amounts to nothing, for there are other races which are so), but also still more because the Colchians, Egyptians, and Ethiopians alone of all the races of men have practised circumcision from the first.”

    Ancient historians Flower and Lydekker said the following concerning the Dravidians:

    “..in southern India they are largely mixed up with a negro element.”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s